Every review starts from zero
The same information is collected again for each vendor instead of being captured once and maintained.
Problem
Why questionnaires and spreadsheets no longer hold up
Vendor risk is still assessed with questionnaires, email threads and spreadsheets. That costs time on every review and leaves nothing solid to show in an audit.
Assessments without a source
You get a verdict, but not the passage it comes from. In an audit, the decision can no longer be justified.
Reviews that never get scheduled
Manual review competes with day-to-day work. Re-assessments and updates keep slipping.
Process
Four steps, one reviewable finding
Short version. The full explanation with architecture and views is on the platform page.
1 · Upload the documents
Questionnaires, certificates, audit reports and contracts for one vendor in one place.
2 · Extraction
The system reads the documents and keeps every data point tied to its source.
3 · Scored proposal
You see a proposed risk level and the passage that supports it.
4 · Review and approval
Your team checks, corrects and approves. Only the approval makes it valid.
Architecture
Read, cited, proposed
Uploaded documents are read, every data point stays linked to its source, and the system proposes an assessment. No write access, no model training, processing in the EU.
Views
See all eight views →
Eight views for six roles
Numbers for leadership, finding trails for the risk team, checklists for audit. All eight views are on the platform page, each with its source.
Numbers and names in the views are examples, not customer data.
Why Leapfacto
Why the name is the programme
Source before score, a clear line between proposal and decision, time spent reviewing instead of searching. The four reasons are on the vendor risk assessment page.
Evidence
Evidence, not assertion
Three commitments: every finding with its source, people decide, processing in the EU.
Use Cases
Four use cases, all available today
From the running assessment to re-assessment, security questionnaires and policy gap analysis.
Vendor Risk Assessment
Review the documents, read the finding with its source, approve the assessment.
Re-Assessment
Keep due dates, expiring evidence and overdue updates in view.
Security Questionnaires
Answer security questionnaires from a cited source instead of from memory.
Policy Gap Analysis
Show where a policy promises something the documents do not support.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Who is Leapfacto for?
For mid-market fintechs, payment providers and consultancies that need to assess vendor risk regularly and traceably, without building their own analysis team.
What does Leapfacto actually do?
You upload your vendor's documents. Leapfacto extracts the relevant facts, proposes a score and shows the source for every finding.
Does Leapfacto replace our vendor risk team?
No. Leapfacto takes over extraction and the scored proposal. Your team checks, corrects and approves.
How is our data processed?
Processing in the EU, a data processing agreement before the pilot, no model training on your content. We confirm the details in writing before the project starts.
How do we start?
With a vendor assessment from your own practice: bring the documents, we show the assessment with its sources and discuss the pilot.
Contact
Review vendor risk without dreading the next assessment wave.
Tell us how you assess vendor risk today. We show you, on your own documents, what Leapfacto recognises and where its limits are.
Book a demo →Or email us directly: info@leaplytics.de
First call is non-binding, remote or on site.
What to bring and how the first call works: contact page.